Business- & Economic Psychology
Master Class
- Cycle IX -
|
2019-10-01 (M1)
|
First Introduction into the field of Business Psychology and the Master of Economic Psychology
|
|
2019-12-16 (M3)
|
Deadline: Send first draft (word.doc) of your research proposal to tarek.el-sehity@sfu.ac.at
|
|
2020-01-17 (M4)
|
Independent peer-reeviews of the assigened research proposals. Please send your reviews on Friday the 17th of January only to:
tarek.el-sehity@sfu.ac.at When writing your review, please consider the following recommendations: |
|
Peer-Review
|
01. Be honest.
02. Do not let personal sympathy or antipathy play a role in your assessments and wording. 03. Be tactful and show respect. 04. Keep in mind that you could be erring and phrase your statements in a reversible manor. 05. Always stay constructive! First focus on the strengths and be encouraging. As you read through the proposals, consider how the draft measures up to the following criteria: With respect to the introductory section (“The state of the art”): 01. Is the introduction well-written and easy to understand? *If yes: which are the strong parts? *If not: underline the parts which are not clear and offer solutions where possible to you. 02. Is the research-question clear and well formulated? *If not: evidence the lack of the research question and/or provide better formulations. 03. Is the structure of the proposal clear and comprehensible? *If not: help in the identification of a better structure (e.g. what to present first and next to what argument…) 04. Do the authors synthesize the literature well? *If not: evidence it. 05. Are you convinced by the relevance of the research question? *Why or why not? State your reasons. 06. Does the introduction identify the topic clearly? *If not, what needs to be clearer? 07. Does the introduction conclude with a hypothesis or a research question (using the first person – “In this research proposal, we will…”). *Remember: the research question provides a strong guiding principle for the rest of the proposal! *If not: Offer some ideas… 08. Use of clear, concrete language and example to develop ideas; attention to detail: *Note in text possible parts to improve. 09. Effective use of source material (textual and visual as appropriate), which is integrated into the argument. *If not: suggest some sources, or mark in red what is better left. 10. Bibliography contains the full list of citation in APA-style? *If not: evidence in red the lack and misquotations. |
|
2020-01-24 (M4)
|
Each author receives the anonymized reviews together with a letter of recommendations from Tarek el Sehity in the form of a single document linked to "Discussant" on this page below. Authors have then 2 weeks to adopt and/or discuss the requested changes and present their adopted research proposal at the roundtable meeting.
|
2020-02-10
|
RoundTable on Research Proposals
|
Tarek el Sehity (TeS) chairs the roundtable meeting.
Structure: 45 minutes are alocated to each research proposal.
-10 min: Author presents research proposal;
-10 min: 3 discussants (ex-reviewers) present their feedback on the adopted research proposal (each discussant 5 minutes);
-05 min: Author replies;
-10 min: Next steps (TeS & Author);
-05 min: Notetakers shortly summarize and restitute their written notes to the author;
-05 min: Author concludes (main learning points).
Structure: 45 minutes are alocated to each research proposal.
-10 min: Author presents research proposal;
-10 min: 3 discussants (ex-reviewers) present their feedback on the adopted research proposal (each discussant 5 minutes);
-05 min: Author replies;
-10 min: Next steps (TeS & Author);
-05 min: Notetakers shortly summarize and restitute their written notes to the author;
-05 min: Author concludes (main learning points).
|
09:00 - 09:15
|
Wellcome & Introduction of the round-table; Tarek el Sehity
|
|
09:15 - 10:00
(1) |
Jiraschek, Th. (2019). Generationenwechsel in Familienunternehmen - Die Gestalltung eines erfolgreichen Uebergangs. Research Proposal. [Version 2019.12.16]
2020.01.24: LETTER FROM THE EDITOR & REVIEWS |
Discussant:
Baldauff, X.;(1) Chrastecky, D.;(1) Steininger, C.;(1) |
Notetaker:
Roeder, C.-S.; Sailler, J.; Straus, E.; Weber, M.; |
|
10:00 - 10:45
(2) |
Steininger, C. (2019). Der psychologische Druck eines berühmten Nachnamen. [Version: 2019.12.16]
LETTER FROM THE EDITOR & REVIEWS |
Discussant:
Jiraschek, Th;(1) Straus, E.;(1) Weber, M.;(1) |
Notetaker:
Baldauff, X.; Chrastecky, D.; Roeder, C.-S.; Sailler, J.; |
|
10:45 - 11:00
|
Coffey Break
|
|
11:00 - 11:45
(3) |
Discussant:
Baldauff, X.;(2) Sailler, J.;(1) Steininger, C.;(2) |
Notetaker:
Chrastecky, D.; Jiraschek, Th; Straus, E.; Weber, M.; |
|
11:45 - 12:30
(4) |
Discussant:
Jiraschek, T.;(2) Roeder, C.-S.;(1) Straus, E.;(2) |
Notetaker:
Baldauff, X.; Jiraschek, T.; Steininger, C.; Weber, M.; |
|
12:30 - 13:30
|
Lunch Break
|
|
13:30 - 14:15
(5) |
Discussant:
Chrastecky, D.;(3) Jiraschek, Th;(3) Steininger, C.;(3) |
Notetaker:
Baldauff, X.; Roeder, C.-S.; Sailler, J.; Weber, M.; |
|
14:15 - 15:00
(6) |
Discussant:
Straus, E.;(3) Weber, M.;(2) Roeder, C.-S.;(2) |
Notetaker:
Baldauff, X.; Sailler, J.; Straus, E.; Steininger, C.; |
|
15:00 - 15:15
|
Coffey Break
|
|
15:15 - 16:00
(7) |
Discussant:
Chrastecky, D.;(2) Sailler, J.;(2) Baldauff, X.;(3) |
Notetaker:
Jiraschek, Th; Roeder, C.-S.; Straus, E.; Steininger, C.; |
|
16:00 - 16:45
(8) |
Discussant:
Roeder, C.-S.;(3) Sailler, J.;(3) Weber, M.;(3) |
Notetaker:
Chrastecky, D.; Jiraschek, Th; Straus, E.; Steininger, C.; |
|
16:45 - 17:00
|
Conclusions & Next Steps (see also below)
|
2020-03-02
|
RERSEARCH WORKSHOP
|
Research Workshop VIIIth Cycle (students of the 4th semester) Presentations of the current status of their master thesis.
It is warmly recommemnded to attend and participate in the research Workshop to develop the proper research. Students of the XIth cycle (you) will be invited to collaborate in pairs as notetakers in one of the timeslots:
It is warmly recommemnded to attend and participate in the research Workshop to develop the proper research. Students of the XIth cycle (you) will be invited to collaborate in pairs as notetakers in one of the timeslots:
- 09:15-10:45
- 11:00-13:00
- 13:30-15:30
|
2020-05-29 (M8)
|
Deadline: Submit Final version of research proposal; Grades for the master class on Paradigms in Economic Psychology
|
|
2020-06-xx (M9)
|
Find and coordinate research with supervisor.
|
|
2020-10-xx (M12-17)
|
Start data collection and data analysis.
|
|
2021-03-xx (M18)
|
Research Workshop: xth Cycle
|
|
2021-06-25 (M21)
|
Submit Masterthesis to supervisor for review. Chose and contact the teacher of your prefered subject for your Master-exam.
|
|
2021-09-xx (M24)
|
Submit final version of your masterthesis for aproval
|